In perl.perl6.internals, you wrote: > Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> As long as packfile functions don't allocate memory (besides their >> own structures) it doesn't matter very much. Nethertheless, when >> doing changes I would include an interpreter param. > I wonder if 'interpreter' is fast becoming the wrong name for the > thing you're passing around (at least from the point of view of > functions like the bytecode generator where you're only really using > the thing as a memory manager.) Yep. I wrote (or a void* argument), though I don't know, how these functions would know, what this argument really is. Maybe callback functions would be a better choice, so that byte code generators could better communicate with packout. WRT memory manager, why not but packfile functions don't need one. leo
