At 7:13 PM +0100 10/28/02, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brent Dax wrote:
> Perhaps you don't understand what I mean. What I'm talking about is the
> fact that most functions in packfile.c don't even take an interpreter
> argument.
I know. Please fetch the new code from CVS.
When there is no interpreter in PIO_eprint, vfprintf gets called.
As we are in the state of changing packfile.c (at least long term):
Should the packfile functions have an interpreter or should the
packfile stay on its own.
They should have an interpreter.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
