Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Juergen Boemmels wrote:
>
>> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>>When there is no interpreter in PIO_eprint, vfprintf gets called.
>>>
>> As we are in the state of changing packfile.c (at least long term):
>> Should the packfile functions have an interpreter or should the
>> packfile stay on its own.
>
>
> As long as packfile functions don't allocate memory (besides their
> own structures) it doesn't matter very much. Nethertheless, when
> doing changes I would include an interpreter param.
I wonder if 'interpreter' is fast becoming the wrong name for the
thing you're passing around (at least from the point of view of
functions like the bytecode generator where you're only really using
the thing as a memory manager.)
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
