Re: [CVS ci] (was: [perl #18097] [PATCH] allow NULL interpreter in sprintf like functions)

[Dan Sugalski]

At 3:13 PM +0100 10/28/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:

Dan Sugalski wrote:

At 1:05 PM +0100 10/27/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:

Though, /me thinks, that we should always have a valid interpreter.

I tried very hard to make sure that there was always a valid interpreter.

Now we have one ;-)

I have, in the past, considered having a parent interpreter that doesn't ever run any code, and is around for the sole purpose of hanging 'global' parrot memory off of. I never did it because I wasn't sure we needed it, but it might be time to dust off the idea.
--
Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk