Juergen Boemmels wrote:

Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

When there is no interpreter in PIO_eprint, vfprintf gets called.

As we are in the state of changing packfile.c (at least long term):
Should the packfile functions have an interpreter or should the
packfile stay on its own.

As long as packfile functions don't allocate memory (besides their own structures) it doesn't matter very much. Nethertheless, when doing changes I would include an interpreter param.

Allocating strings or PMCs does require a valid interpreter now. The current PIO_eprintf calls with a null interpreter call vfprintf, so don't harm.


bye
b.

leo


Reply via email to