On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 12:44:11PM -0400, James Mastros wrote: > I hate yelling without good reason, but this /is/ good reason. CAN SOMBODY > PLEASE TELL ME A _GOOD_ REASON TO SWITCH TO . FOR METHOD CALLS? You've made it impossible for anyone to answer you until you tell us what "good" means to you. We could give reasons all day long and you could reply with "those aren't GOOD reasons". How about this one: Because Larry said so. Seems good enough to me. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) David L. Nicol
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Graham Barr
- Re: Tying & Overloading Damien Neil
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading David L. Nicol
- Re: Tying & Overloading James Mastros
- Re: Tying & Overloading Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Tying & Overloading Andy Dougherty
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Larry Wall
- Re: Tying & Overloading H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Tying & Overloading Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski