On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:01:11AM -0700, Damien Neil wrote: > If you're dead-set on reassigning ., please consider leaving it at > that, rather than juggling all the other operators around. Don't forget that binary ~ doesn't currently exist, so this is adding syntax rather than reassigning it. > Make concatination be "$a cat $b". ("eq" and friends already provide > precedent for string operators being words rather than symbols.) While that's true, concatenation is quite a common operation (Introspection is cool. Run "perl -MO=Terse someprogram | grep concat".) that I'd be really uncomfortable with it necessitating 4 keystrokes (" cat") instead of one. -- emacs: Terminal type "emacs" is not powerful enough to run Emacs.
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) David L. Nicol
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Graham Barr
- Re: Tying & Overloading Damien Neil
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading David L. Nicol
- Re: Tying & Overloading James Mastros
- Re: Tying & Overloading Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Tying & Overloading Andy Dougherty
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Larry Wall