At 10:10 AM 4/23/2001 -0700, Larry Wall wrote: >=?iso-8859-1?Q?Dav=ED=F0?= Helgason writes: >: I _really_ think dot-syntax would make perl prettier as well as make it >: more acceptable to the world of javacsharpbasic droids. Which is some >: kind of goal, no? > >Consider it a given that we'll be using . for dereferencing. (Possibly >with -> as a synonym, just for Dan. :-) Heh. Don't worry about me--if the parser isn't put together well enough for a non-parser guy like me to get use Dan; to work, then it means we're not done with the parser. ;) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) David L. Nicol
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Graham Barr
- Re: Tying & Overloading Damien Neil
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading David L. Nicol
- Re: Tying & Overloading James Mastros
- Re: Tying & Overloading Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Tying & Overloading Andy Dougherty
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Larry Wall
- Re: Tying & Overloading H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Tying & Overloading Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Tying & Overloading John Porter