Re: Tying & Overloading

[John Porter]

Simon Cozens wrote:
> John Porter wrote:
> >   $a = $b $c;
> 
> Actually, I'd rather like that to be equivalent to
>     $a = $c->$b;

Oops, sorry, I forgot the smiley.

Oh, but thinking seriously about it:
do we really want to keep the "indirect object" syntax?
It is said to be a major source of ambiguity in perl.

-- 
John Porter