John Porter wrote: > We could y/$@%/@%$/ ... ... and create an alternate parser able to handle the full internal internals API. I have finally figured out the main motivation behind the whole perl6 effort: the obfuscated perl contests were getting repetitive. Good night.
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Russ Allbery
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) nick
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) David L. Nicol
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Simon Cozens
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Graham Barr
- Re: Tying & Overloading Damien Neil
- Re: Tying & Overloading Simon Cozens
- Re: Tying & Overloading Bart Lateur
- Re: Tying & Overloading Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Tying & Overloading Dan Sugalski
- Re: Tying & Overloading David L. Nicol
- Re: Tying & Overloading James Mastros
- Re: Tying & Overloading Jonathan Scott Duff