Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My vote is to ditch the concat operator altogether. Hey, we have
> interpolation!
> "$this$is$just$as$ugly$but$it$works"
How do you concatenate together a list of variables that's longer than one
line without using super-long lines? Going to the shell syntax of:
PATH=/some/long:/bunch/of:/stuff
PATH="${PATH}:/more/stuff"
would really be a shame.
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) David L. Nicol
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Casey West
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Russ Allbery
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Bart Lateur
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) nick
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Branden
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) Nathan Wiger
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Strings vs Numbers (Re: Tying & Overloading) David L. Nicol
