Don't forget that the rationale behind the infix dereferencing is this: @variable_name @{variable_name} @$scalar_containing_variable_name @$scalar_containing_value_ref @{ code evaluating to variable name } @{ code giving value ref } Nat
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... Karl Glazebrook