Nathan Torkington wrote: > John Porter writes: > > foo $= ( bar, quux ); # provide scalar context to both sides > > foo @= ( bar, quux ); # provide list context to both sides > > I assume you've dropped this idea as well, given the argument that you > would be dropping prefix symbols but creating a lot of new operators > to do the same task? Sure. It was just an idea. But who knows, maybe I'll take it up again some day... :-) -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... David Corbin
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... John Barnette
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Barnette
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Nathan Torkington