Steve Fink writes: > True. Would anyone mourn @$scalar_containing_variable_name if it died? > I've never used it, and I'm rather glad I haven't. Perl5's -w doesn't > notice $x="var"; print @$x either -- it'll complain if you mention @var > once. These are symbolic references. You can forbid them with the strict pragma. Yes, I'd miss them. So would the Exporter. > Damn, learn something new every day... perl really is incestuous with > its symbol table, isn't it? Yes. That's what makes it useful. Nat
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... John Porter