Ted Ashton wrote:
> 
> >                                                               all
> > dereferencing can be done with ->.
> 
> Is that "can be done with" or "must be done with"?
> 
> Either way, I like the idea.  To me it reads more smoothly, and as I seldom
> dare to use the double-punctuation form ($$ and so on) and use instead the
> ${$} form, it would be an equal number of characters and fewer curlies (which,
> I think, is a win).

Can be done with. @{ foo() || bar() } seems preferable to, say,
[scalar(foo() || bar())]->[0]->@. :-)

Reply via email to