Ted Ashton wrote: > > > all > > dereferencing can be done with ->. > > Is that "can be done with" or "must be done with"? > > Either way, I like the idea. To me it reads more smoothly, and as I seldom > dare to use the double-punctuation form ($$ and so on) and use instead the > ${$} form, it would be an equal number of characters and fewer curlies (which, > I think, is a win). Can be done with. @{ foo() || bar() } seems preferable to, say, [scalar(foo() || bar())]->[0]->@. :-)
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Karl Glazebrook