[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) wrote on 15.08.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The ultimate target of a program's source code is the *programmer*. True. > Programmers, being people (well, more or less... :), work best with symbols > and rich context. This particular programmer *hates* what Perl does with @ and %. >Stripping contextual clues out of code does the > programmer a disservice. You mean like when you access members of @x, you have to write $x? >We're at the point where we don't have to cater to > the limitations of the computer hardware. That means we'll be better off if > we cater to the limitations (and strengths!) of people's wetware. Please do, and get rid of this particular language misfeature. MfG Kai
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ri... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ge... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let'... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise -... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noi... Steve Fink