Not so.
Read:
http://www.barrieglover.demon.co.uk/copyright.html
Under the section "Certain Artistic Works on Public Display" which
references the 1988 UK copyright act:
"A building which is a work of architecture may be freely photographed and
that photograph reproduced; however the model for that work of architecture
can only be photographed if it is permanently situated in a public place or
in premises open to the public. The architect's drawings for the same
building may not be photographed without the permission of the architect."
doctor digi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: UK copyright
> Take a picture of someones house from the public street and sell
> it to an ad agency who puts it up on billboards all over the
> country, uses it in a magazine ad campaign, and otherwise
> indicates there is money involved. The owner will have a hundred
> lawyers offering to sue you for him for a percentage of the
> take. I hope you have high limit liability insurance 'cause he
> is going to win.
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
