Hmmmm....
Somehow, I doubt that anyone can stop someone from publishing a piccie of a hunk
o' property in the UK, either. Were that the case, we wouldn't see shots of
Bonnie Prince Charlie wandering about that estate the Royals own in Scotland,
all decked out in his kilt and wellies. All Liz would have to do is "copyright"
the property (or whatever), and all those papparazzi with their 1000 mm lenses
at the edge of the property wouldn't be able to take any shots. IMHO, anyway.
regards,
frank
Bucky wrote:
> That is really interesting! Here in Canada, it doesn't matter how badly you
> object to my publishing a picture of something you own, I am free to do so.
> As long as I don't trespass the land to get the picture, I can do as I
> please.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Harry Baughman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:40 PM
> Subject: Re: UK copyright
>
> > i don't think it matters where you shoot it from. it is the property
> > that they don't want you photographing
> >
> >
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .