There is no such doctrine as long as you don't misrepresent what
the photograph shows then there is nothing the property owner can
do about you if you publish a photo of their property taken from a
public venue.
At 07:36 PM 7/16/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>In the US it is a matter of is the picture in the public
>interest or not. Public interest is photojournalistic, etc.
>Private interested is commercial. The property owner has the
>right to exploit his property and to prevent others from
>doing so.
>--Tom
>
>
>Bucky wrote:
> >
> > That is really interesting! Here in Canada, it doesn't matter how
> badly you
> > object to my publishing a picture of something you own, I am free to do so.
> > As long as I don't trespass the land to get the picture, I can do as I
> > please.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Harry Baughman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 2:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: UK copyright
> >
> > > i don't think it matters where you shoot it from. it is the property
> > > that they don't want you photographing
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -
> > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>-
>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
