Shel Belinkoff writes: > You know what my general preferences are, but I'm curious what you > think the advantages of manual advance are. As far as I'm concerned a manual advance is far quieter and is not battery- dependent. I would love a camera with selectable auto/manual frame advance and rewind. Cheers, - Dave David A. Mann, B.E. email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ "Why is it that if an adult behaves like a child they lock him up, while children are allowed to run free on the streets?" -- Garfield - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Alan Chan
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know William Robb
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Pentax Clover
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Alan Chan
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Shel Belinkoff
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know David A. Mann
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Shel Belinkoff
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Rob Studdert
- Re[2]: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Takehiko Ueda
- Re: Re[2]: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Treena Harp
- Re: : MZ-S is really sucks, now I know P�l Jensen
- Re: : MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Pentax Clover
- Re: : MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Rob Studdert
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know Doug Brewer
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know P�l Jensen
- Re: MZ-S is really sucks, now I know P�l Jensen

