Hi Dhruv, Adrian, WG, Proposed changes looks good to me and +1 for moving this through. The diff text was a clear easy read.
Thanks Andrew From: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> Date: Wednesday, August 21, 2024 at 11:42 PM To: pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org> Cc: draft-dhody-pce-iana-upd...@ietf.org <draft-dhody-pce-iana-upd...@ietf.org>, draft-farrel-pce-experimental-err...@ietf.org <draft-farrel-pce-experimental-err...@ietf.org> Subject: [Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Hi WG, Please find a proposed update that merges draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors - https://ietf-wg-pce.github.io/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update.html Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-pce-iana-update&url_2=https://ietf-wg-pce.github.io/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update.txt Please let us know if you have an objection to this update. Authors will post the revision in the datatracker next week and will request Julien to move this I-D quickly. Feel free to also provide your comments and edits. Thanks! Dhruv & Adrian On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 2:59 PM <julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>> wrote: Hi all, We have clear support and no objection on adopting this small I-D: it is now a PCE WG item. @Authors: please re-submit the draft as draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-00. @Authors of draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors: please talk to the authors of the aforementioned I-D to consider adding your proposal as a contribution into this new WG effort. Thank you, Julien Le 30/07/2024 à 10:36, julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com> a écrit : > Hi all, > > In his review of the "native IP" draft, John suggested to consider > adjusting to "IETF Review" the allocation policy of some of the PCEP > registries currently using "Standards Action". Dhruv has submitted > draft-dhody-pce-iana-update to quickly resolve this concern and bring > higher consistency among PCEP registries. > > As a result, does the WG support the adoption of > draft-dhody-pce-iana-update [1] as a WG item? Please, share your > feedback using the PCE mailing list and include your rationale in case > you're opposed. > > Thanks, > > Julien > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iana-update/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org> To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
