Hi all,
In his review of the "native IP" draft, John suggested to consider
adjusting to "IETF Review" the allocation policy of some of the PCEP
registries currently using "Standards Action". Dhruv has submitted
draft-dhody-pce-iana-update to quickly resolve this concern and bring
higher consistency among PCEP registries.
As a result, does the WG support the adoption of
draft-dhody-pce-iana-update [1] as a WG item? Please, share your
feedback using the PCE mailing list and include your rationale in case
you're opposed.
Thanks,
Julien
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iana-update/
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
