Hi, Dhruv:


2)    
Should the table 2 in section 3, add one line to describe the Error-Type 0-251, and their corresponding Error-Value?

And note that the practice of maintaining two tables is a standard practice as seen at https://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-messages


[WAJ] This is what exactly I want to suggest. This draft will update RFC5440, the newly added table shouldn’t only cover the newly assigned type range.

Thanks! 
Dhruv

 

Best Regards

 

Aijun Wang

China Telecom

 

发件人: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org [mailto:forwardingalgori...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2024822 11:42
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: draft-dhody-pce-iana-upd...@ietf.org; draft-farrel-pce-experimental-err...@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update

 

Hi WG,

 

Please find a proposed update that merges draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors https://ietf-wg-pce.github.io/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update.html

 

Please let us know if you have an objection to this update. Authors will post the revision in the datatracker next week and will request Julien to move this I-D quickly. 

Feel free to also provide your comments and edits. 

 

Thanks! 

Dhruv & Adrian

 

On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 2:59PM <julien.meu...@orange.com> wrote:

Hi all,

We have clear support and no objection on adopting this small I-D: it is
now a PCE WG item.

@Authors: please re-submit the draft as draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-00.

@Authors of draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors: please talk to the
authors of the aforementioned I-D to consider adding your proposal as a
contribution into this new WG effort.

Thank you,

Julien


Le 30/07/2024 à 10:36, julien.meu...@orange.com a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> In his review of the "native IP" draft, John suggested to consider
> adjusting to "IETF Review" the allocation policy of some of the PCEP
> registries currently using "Standards Action". Dhruv has submitted
> draft-dhody-pce-iana-update to quickly resolve this concern and bring
> higher consistency among PCEP registries.
>
> As a result, does the WG support the adoption of
> draft-dhody-pce-iana-update [1] as a WG item? Please, share your
> feedback using the PCE mailing list and include your rationale in case
> you're opposed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julien
>
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iana-update/
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to