Hi all,We have clear support and no objection on adopting this small I-D: it is now a PCE WG item.
@Authors: please re-submit the draft as draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-00.@Authors of draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors: please talk to the authors of the aforementioned I-D to consider adding your proposal as a contribution into this new WG effort.
Thank you, Julien Le 30/07/2024 à 10:36, julien.meu...@orange.com a écrit :
Hi all,In his review of the "native IP" draft, John suggested to consider adjusting to "IETF Review" the allocation policy of some of the PCEP registries currently using "Standards Action". Dhruv has submitted draft-dhody-pce-iana-update to quickly resolve this concern and bring higher consistency among PCEP registries.As a result, does the WG support the adoption of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update [1] as a WG item? Please, share your feedback using the PCE mailing list and include your rationale in case you're opposed.Thanks, Julien [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iana-update/
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to pce-le...@ietf.org
