On Apr 25, 2025, at 11:29 AM, Guy Harris <ghar...@sonic.net> wrote: > On Apr 25, 2025, at 6:15 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> [JMC] I want to push this draft to the IESG today. Can you and Michael >> submit this revision so we can move it forward? > > That's OK with me. I've also committed a change to consistently refer to the > values defined by that I-D as LinkType values, rather than Linktype or > LINKTYPE values, as LinkType is the name used in the pcap and pcapng I-Ds for > the fields in which those values appear (and the InterCapping is similar to > EtherType). This was in response to a comment in a review of the -05 draft at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-05-intdir-lc-bernardos-2024-08-22/: > >> "Linktypes" and LINKTYPE" are used sometimes with the same meaning (I guess).
The names of the values are still of the form LINKTYPE_, as they're likely to be used as C/C+/etc. #defines, which conventionally are all-caps or mostly-caps. (This also matches what's done in macOS and probably other OSes, tcpdump, and Wireshark for #defines for EtherTypes, which are of the form ETHERTYPE_.)
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
