Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> wrote:
> I see that you submitted a new revision over the weekend that addresses
> the nits around 2119 and the references. However, it raised two
> others. You reference both RFC1051 and 1201 (do you need the former if
I don't think so, so I'll remove it.
Updates thanks to Guy's hard work on this.
Guy also fixed most of the things at id-nits complained about.
> you have the latter?), and there is an unused reference on STANAG-5066.
Thanks for catching that.
> At least the latter should be fixed, but you may have a reason for the
> former.
> I want to submit this to IESG by Friday. Can you address these
> remaining two nits by then? Thanks.
Fixed.
I'll hold off posting a new version until Wednesday, to see if there are
additional comments.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
