I see that you submitted a new revision over the weekend that addresses the
nits around 2119 and the references. However, it raised two others. You
reference both RFC1051 and 1201 (do you need the former if you have the
latter?), and there is an unused reference on STANAG-5066. At least the latter
should be fixed, but you may have a reason for the former.
I want to submit this to IESG by Friday. Can you address these remaining two
nits by then? Thanks.
Joe
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 15:23
To: Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: Link-Layer Types for PCAP and PCAPNG Capture
File Formats (draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype)
The IPR poll is done. I’m asking about the shepherd question to get explicit
desire to be an author and to act as a DE. If the answer is yes to both,
great! I will note that in my shepherd write-up.
On the “polish” I pointed out NITs being raised due to old references. My
question to you, the authors, was whether it made sense to update them. That’s
when Guy responded with a desire to publish a new revision.
I said I don’t think any more polish is needed (i.e., formatting). It does
sound like there are some substantive updates to references pending, and that
would be a worthy update. I haven’t heard any feedback from the WG that says
more changes are needed.
Joe
From: Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca>
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 14:41
To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: Link-Layer Types for PCAP and PCAPNG
Capture File Formats (draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype)
Joe Clarke \(jclarke\) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> * Authors wish to update the I-D to address some references
I think we are really done.
It could be polished forever.
> * The shepherd (me) is awaiting confirmation from Michael as to his
> desire to be author and to be listed as an initial designated expert
> for the new registry.
Huh? I was sure I answered that I had no IPR months ago.
_I have no IPR_
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
