On Apr 21, 2025, at 6:47 AM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I see that you submitted a new revision over the weekend that addresses the > nits around 2119 and the references. However, it raised two others. You > reference both RFC1051 and 1201 (do you need the former if you have the > latter?), We now reference neither. (The ARCNET linktypes are marked as "Reserved for"; some if not all of them, as implemented in the corresponding operating systems, have enough annoying quirks that they'd probably need a LINKTYPE_ page worth of text to explain them - the BSD ARCNET code one might, for fragmented packets, supply both the fragments *and* the reassembled packet, and I think the Linux code may shuffle some fields in the ARCNET header. So I'm just punting on giving them detailed descriptions; a subsequent I-D/RFC can be issued, changing it to point at a LINKTYPE_ page, if desired.) _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
