How about Bat-Mano?
On Aug 5, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Bob Monkman
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Guiseppe, Chris,
Good comments and I like fun names. I see both sides on this
one. I thought it was worth a look, since Yuan brought it up and I could see
how it could _possibly_ be misconstrued. As was said, if a critical mass were
to think it an issue, the Open Baton team- else I do not feel strong enough to
push on it. Good luck with the project Giuseppe and team.
Regards,
Bob
Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490
From: Carella, Giuseppe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 4:32 PM
To: Christopher Price
Cc: Bob Monkman; Liu Yuan; BIN;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi all,
indeed that was our intention, to have a funny name…considering our open
“baton" we thought it would make sense to build an orchestra using the OPNFV
instruments (projects) :-)
of course, I agree that if there are major concerns we’ll have to reconsider it.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)
On 05 Aug 2016, at 17:26, Christopher Price
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Bob,
I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a name.
In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did
ask that the team consider revising the name. If a project was to propose the
name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to reconsider.
Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space
and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining
theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something
similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.
I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are
concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here.
/ Chris
From:
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
on behalf of Bob Monkman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
To: Liu Yuan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, BIN
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Carella, Giuseppe"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Yuan,
I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.
I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.
One opinion,
Bob
Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490
From:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi,
I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning.
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.
About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there
is a difference between these two projects.
Regards,
Yuan
________________________________
Liu Yuan
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:23
To: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:[email protected]>
CC:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
Michael Pauls<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Giuseppe,
I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton,
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)
Regards,
Yuan
________________________________
Liu Yuan
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:00
To: Liu Yuan<mailto:[email protected]>
CC:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
Michael Pauls<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Yuan,
I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names,
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a
proposal...
We can discuss about it during the next conference call.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)
On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Giuseppe,
I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.
Regards,
Yuan
________________________________
Liu Yuan
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: 2016-08-02 05:08
To:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
CC: Michael Pauls<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi all,
please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available
to present it during the next TSC call.
Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.
[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra
Cheers,
Giuseppe
Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
