Hi Bob,
I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a name. In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did ask that the team consider revising the name. If a project was to propose the name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to reconsider. Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate. I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here. / Chris From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Bob Monkman <[email protected]> Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59 To: Liu Yuan <[email protected]>, BIN <[email protected]>, "Carella, Giuseppe" <[email protected]> Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal Yuan, I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue such a name “grabs” the function for one option. I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team. One opinion, Bob Robert (Bob) Monkman Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager 150 Rose Orchard Way San Jose, Ca 95134 M: +1.510.676.5490 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal Hi, I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name. About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there is a difference between these two projects. Regards, Yuan Liu Yuan [email protected] From: [email protected] Date: 2016-08-02 18:23 To: Carella, Giuseppe CC: [email protected]; Michael Pauls Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal Hi Giuseppe, I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :) Regards, Yuan Liu Yuan [email protected] From: Carella, Giuseppe Date: 2016-08-02 18:00 To: Liu Yuan CC: [email protected]; Michael Pauls Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal Hi Yuan, I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a proposal... We can discuss about it during the next conference call. Cheers, Giuseppe Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/) On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Giuseppe, I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better. Regards, Yuan Liu Yuan [email protected] From: Carella, Giuseppe Date: 2016-08-02 05:08 To: [email protected] CC: Michael Pauls Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal Hi all, please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available to present it during the next TSC call. Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved. [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra Cheers, Giuseppe Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/) IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
