Guiseppe, Chris,
                Good comments and I like fun names. I see both sides on this 
one. I thought it was worth a look, since Yuan brought it up and I could see 
how it could _possibly_ be misconstrued. As was said, if a critical mass were 
to think it an issue, the Open Baton team- else I do not feel strong enough to 
push on it. Good luck with the project Giuseppe and team.
Regards,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: Carella, Giuseppe [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 4:32 PM
To: Christopher Price
Cc: Bob Monkman; Liu Yuan; BIN; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi all,

indeed that was our intention, to have a funny name…considering our open 
“baton" we thought it would make sense to build an orchestra using the OPNFV 
instruments (projects) :-)

of course, I agree that if there are major concerns we’ll have to reconsider it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 05 Aug 2016, at 17:26, Christopher Price 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Bob,

I tend to agree with you, but personally don’t put that much stock into a name.
In the case of OPNFV-MANO the name was indicative of an area in OPNFV so we did 
ask that the team consider revising the name.  If a project was to propose the 
name OPNFV “orchestration” I would similarly ask them to reconsider.

Opera and Orchestra I thank are really fun names that refer to the MANO space 
and activities is service orchestration, I had thought it was an entertaining 
theme and to be honest was wondering if the OSM group might choose something 
similarly theatrical if/when they were to participate.

I guess I had not considered this name to be an issue, but if there are 
concerns with it let’s discuss it openly every opinion counts here.

/ Chris


From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Bob Monkman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday 5 August 2016 at 16:59
To: Liu Yuan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, BIN 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Carella, Giuseppe" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Yuan,
                I can see your point. I think projects should avoid names that 
come to close to appearing to describe themselves as _the_ solution for some 
category of function, unless the project is an umbrella for multiple options. I 
am not judging that this was the intent with Orchestra, but one could argue 
such a name “grabs” the function for one option.

                I think we made a mistake with Fast Data Stacks, but no one 
else seemed to question it. It comprises a single vendor solution for a broad 
function area that has innumerable options. I think teams should be sent back 
to the drawing board for a new name, as was asked of Open-O team.

One opinion,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Liu Yuan
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:25 AM
To: BIN; Carella, Giuseppe
Cc: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal

Hi,

I just recall the OPNFV OPEN-O project was named OPNFV-MANO at the beginning. 
And during the discussion, the team thought the scope were too broad, and 
needed focus or convergence. Then the project changed the name.

About the name of the Orchestra, I think have the similar situation. The 
meaning of Orchestra also includes broad scopes. So, I am wondering why there 
is a difference between these two projects.

Regards,
Yuan

________________________________
Liu Yuan
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:23
To: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:[email protected]>
CC: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Giuseppe,

I just think your project needs a unique name to represent the Open Baton, 
instead of a general name. Anyway, we can see others' suggestions on this. :)

Regards,
Yuan
________________________________
Liu Yuan
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: 2016-08-02 18:00
To: Liu Yuan<mailto:[email protected]>
CC: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
Michael Pauls<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi Yuan,

I get your point, however we are not aware of any guidelines for project names, 
therefore we believe this is the most appropriate name for this project. If 
this is a common issue, we can change the name. Consider that this is only a 
proposal...

We can discuss about it during the next conference call.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

On 02 Aug 2016, at 11:44, Liu Yuan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Giuseppe,

I am confused about the name of the project. Your main objective is to 
integrate between Open Baton and OPNFV. There are many MANO / Orcheatrator open 
source projects, and there is a MANO group in the OPNFV. I don't think you 
could use the "Orchestra" to only appoint to the Open Baton, maybe named Open 
Baton or OPNFV-Open Baton are more better.

Regards,
Yuan
________________________________
Liu Yuan
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

From: Carella, Giuseppe<mailto:[email protected]>
Date: 2016-08-02 05:08
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
CC: Michael Pauls<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Orchestra] new project proposal
Hi all,

please find on the wiki [1] a new project proposal, named Orchestra, having as 
main objective the integration between Open Baton and OPNFV. We’ll be available 
to present it during the next TSC call.

Get in touch if you are interested in getting involved.

[1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Orchestra

Cheers,
Giuseppe

Join us at the IEEE 5G Week in November in Berlin (http://www.berlin5gweek.org/)

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to