Sweet, let me know if u have any questions, bug me when I get back tomorrow (spent some time in HK to travel around, since during the summit most all the traveling was from the airport to the asiaworld) making it hard to actually see any of hong kong (except at night). So let me know if u want to discuss it :-)
Also: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow -Josh On 11/12/13 3:09 AM, "Robert Collins" <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: >On 12 November 2013 22:47, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >> Yes it's still a thing and no it's not being deprecated, I heard other >>things from other people at rackspace say the opposite, so maybe u >>misunderstood adrian (if or if not rackspace is involved is there >>choice in the end). >> >> So yes it's still being actively developed and yes it's gaining >>traction. I don't see that traction slowing down. There was a lot if >>summit sessions on it that I did so I'm not sure where u heard that it's >>not active. >> >> And as for spiff sure can use that also, but IMHO u will come to the >>same conclusions I did, that I believe spiff is functionally inferior, >>your mileage may vary though. Likely there are use cases for both in the >>end; feel free to do your own investigation into what each offers. Spiff >>to me lacked a well defined state machine, was to complex and did not >>have foundational semantics that taskflow does have (extremely important >>ones like resumption, reversion and state persistence...). But feel free >>to make up your own mind, it's a free world after all... > >Ok cool, thats good to know. I only asked because of what I was >hearing. I will see about looking in detail in my copious free time :) > >-Rob > >-- >Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> >Distinguished Technologist >HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
