So I'm curious - is taskflow still a thing? Adrian was saying in HK that Rackspace wasn't investing in it any more as another library - Spiffy? - was functionally superior, and there is no need to reinvent the wheel.
If thats the case, should Mistral be built on Spiffy, and taskflow deprecated? -Rob On 12 November 2013 13:56, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Sounds good, > > Will do when I get back from HK, still here exploring :-) > > Sent from my really tiny device... > >> On Nov 11, 2013, at 10:17 PM, "Monty Taylor" <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: >> >> Ok. Cool. Let's just put an upper bound on it for now then (mainly >> because it's listed as 0.1, so that version to me suggests that it might >> still have breaking API churn) >> >>> On 11/11/2013 07:53 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> I can put an upper bound on the version, that's fine with me. I'd rather >>> not avoid adding taskflow to wait until some new preemptive gating process >>> is in place. That doesn't exactly feel fair to the people creating taskflow >>> or the people using it, especially since people are integrating it at this >>> moment and it would be sad for their work to be lost due to a requirement >>> line. >>> >>> As for part of oslo, cc'ing Doug since from my talks with him seem to be >>> that it's just a library and to encourage the growth of useful libraries >>> the red tape isn't needed (aka, taskflow has no strong ties to oslo and I'm >>> not sure it should). >>> >>> Sent from my really tiny device... >>> >>>> On Nov 11, 2013, at 7:33 PM, "Monty Taylor" <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> There is a change up to add taskflow to the global requirements. I have >>>> no problem with this in principle, but it's one more that's in the set >>>> of things like pecan, wsme and friends that are in the set of things >>>> that Sean talked about in preemptively gate the universe. >>>> >>>> I'd like to not add it until we have a plan for at least assymetrical >>>> gating, so that changes to taskflow at least can't break cinder and >>>> friends. >>>> >>>> Further, I think we might need to discuss how to include libraries such >>>> as this. Should taskflow be a part of oslo? >>> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
