On 12 November 2013 22:47, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Yes it's still a thing and no it's not being deprecated, I heard other things > from other people at rackspace say the opposite, so maybe u misunderstood > adrian (if or if not rackspace is involved is there choice in the end). > > So yes it's still being actively developed and yes it's gaining traction. I > don't see that traction slowing down. There was a lot if summit sessions on > it that I did so I'm not sure where u heard that it's not active. > > And as for spiff sure can use that also, but IMHO u will come to the same > conclusions I did, that I believe spiff is functionally inferior, your > mileage may vary though. Likely there are use cases for both in the end; feel > free to do your own investigation into what each offers. Spiff to me lacked a > well defined state machine, was to complex and did not have foundational > semantics that taskflow does have (extremely important ones like resumption, > reversion and state persistence...). But feel free to make up your own mind, > it's a free world after all...
Ok cool, thats good to know. I only asked because of what I was hearing. I will see about looking in detail in my copious free time :) -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
