On 09/18/2015 06:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 17/09/15 15:47 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-09-17 18:10:26 +0200: >>> Monty Taylor wrote: >>> > I agree- and this is a great example of places where human >>> judgement is >>> > better than rules. >>> > >>> > For instance - one of the projects had a nominee but it missed the >>> > deadline, so that's probably an easy on. >>> > >>> > For one of the projects it had been looking dead for a while, so >>> this is >>> > the final nail in the coffin from my POV >>> > >>> > For the other three - I know they're still active projects with people >>> > interested in them, so sorting them out will be fun! >>> >>> Looks like in 4 cases (Magnum, Barbican, Murano, Security) there is >>> actually a candidate, they just missed the deadline. So that should be >>> an easy discussion at the next TC meeting.
To be more precise, there are 2 candidacies for Magnum and 1 for Security. I would prefer all candidates have their candidacy statement proposed and then merged upon TC decision. >>> >>> For the last one, it is not an accident. I think it is indeed the final >>> nail on the coffin. >>> >> >> Yes, I was planning to wait until after the summit to propose that we >> drop MagnetoDB from the official list of projects due to inactivity. We >> can deal with it sooner, obviously. > > +1 > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
