My 2 cents: I like to solve problems and seems like this is a common problem in many conferences, seminars, etc. The usual way of solving this issue is to have a grace period with last minute extension to deadline for proposals, possibly for a unknown period of time and unannounced. However, in this particular case the published schedule of voting on the wiki can be a spoiler. May be there's a workaround I'm not thinking here but anyways, it's out there now.
On 9/17/15 9:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on > the wiki[0]. > > There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this > resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Barbican, > MagnetoDB, Magnum, Murano and Security > > There are 7 projects that will have an election: Cinder, Glance, Ironic, > Keystone, Mistral, Neutron and Oslo. The details for those will be > posted tomorrow after Tony and I setup the CIVS system. > > Thank you, > Tristan > > > [0]: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_September_2015#Confirmed_Candidates > [1]: > http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for-leaderless-programs.html > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks, Nikhil __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
