On 18/09/15 13:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
I agree with Ed here.

If we have a stipulated time period set for proposals then grace period sounds
like a real-life deal. However, I would also encourage the idea of opening this
up early and keep the folder ready and officials review the merge prop 2 months
prior to the final date. It's better to have a final date with longer open
period than a small firm set date.

my 2 pennies worth.

On 9/18/15 1:15 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:

   On Sep 18, 2015, at 7:27 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:


           I'm strongly against this extra rules. OpenStack Officials Elections 
are
           ran by volunteers and any rules that adds complexity should be 
avoided.

       +1

       Also, the schedule is announced 6 months in advance. The candidacy
       period is announced when it starts and a reminder is sent a couple of
       days before it ends.

   +1 to sticking to deadlines. A grace period just mean a different deadline.

   I don't, however, see the need for a firm start date. Comparing this to the 
feature freeze development cycle, in Nova we started opening up the specs for 
the N+1 cycle early in cycle N so that people can propose a spec early instead 
of waiting months and potentially missing the next window. So how about letting 
candidates declare early in the cycle by adding their names to the election 
repo at any time during the cycle up to the firm deadline? This might also 
encourage candidates not to wait until the last minute.

Agreed,

Just wanted to mention that this was also proposed here: 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074888.html

Ideally, we'd have the repo open as soon as the code name for the next
cycle is chosen (since the code name is needed).

Flavio


   -- Ed Leafe







__________________________________________________________________________
   OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
   Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
   http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


--

Thanks,
Nikhil


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco

Attachment: pgpH7R5qKvAHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to