It's a lot of work to maintain, trust me - anyway, it'd be better to convince the opensim team to allow viewer developers in.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Argent Stonecutter <secret.arg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds like an "impure opensim" fork is needed. > > On 2010-04-02, at 08:19, Gareth Nelson wrote: > >> If these people also work on the viewer, they're banned from >> contributing patches to opensim >> >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> wrote: >>> >>> What is the reason that those fixes aren't incorporated in "pure" >>> opensim? > > -- “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - Printcrime by Cory Doctrow Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
