Starting a fork can light a fire under a parochial developer team. It worked for GCC with EGCS.
On 2010-04-02, at 10:49, Gareth Nelson wrote: > It's a lot of work to maintain, trust me - anyway, it'd be better to > convince the opensim team to allow viewer developers in. > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Argent Stonecutter > <secret.arg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sounds like an "impure opensim" fork is needed. >> >> On 2010-04-02, at 08:19, Gareth Nelson wrote: >> >>> If these people also work on the viewer, they're banned from >>> contributing patches to opensim >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> What is the reason that those fixes aren't incorporated in "pure" >>>> opensim? >> >> > > > > -- > “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for > everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - > Printcrime by Cory Doctrow > > Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. > See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html "Welcome back, Anonymous, we're glad to see you again!" _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
