On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:39:39AM -0500, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > >Assume that the project will result in jackets > >(the canonical example) can be tucked in and/or being > >worn under shirts. Would you really still need it to > >be converted to a shirt? > > If the project was going to achieve that goal, then they wouldn't > really *be* jackets vs shirts vs undershirts any more, they'd just > be "tops". But that's not what Nyx has proposed.
That is not really true. The big difference between jackets and shirts is that jackets have a texture on the lower part too. Also, the default insertion point when wearing a new item would still be different. -- Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
