On 2010-03-26, at 07:06, Carlo Wood wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:41:10AM -0500, Argent Stonecutter wrote: >> I'm not proposing "wear as undershirt". >> >> I'm proposing "convert this into an undershirt". > > But with what goal?
I've got dozens of vests and shirts and jackets on the "wrong" layers because they were part of an outfit that had wearables on weird layers to deal with the problem that this change is designed to fix, and I want to move them to a layer that makes sense now. > Assume that the project will result in jackets > (the canonical example) can be tucked in and/or being > worn under shirts. Would you really still need it to > be converted to a shirt? If the project was going to achieve that goal, then they wouldn't really *be* jackets vs shirts vs undershirts any more, they'd just be "tops". But that's not what Nyx has proposed. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
