Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy

[Thomas Shikami]

Ryan McDougall schrieb:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Soft Linden <s...@lindenlab.com> wrote:
>   
>> If you see any wording that's ambiguous about that, let us know.
>>     
>
> Section 3.b.iii says that Third-party viewers must comply with the GPL 
> license.
>
> What if the view is not licensed under the GPL at all -- say Apache 2.0?
>
> Cheers,
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>
>   
It says, that Third-Party Viewers deriving from LL's GPLed viewer source 
must comply with the GPL license. That doesn't apply to libomv based 
viewers or pygop based ones or smalltalk or a complete reimplementation 
of it.
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges