On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Soft Linden <s...@lindenlab.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Ryan McDougall <sempu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Soft Linden <s...@lindenlab.com> wrote: >>> >>> If you see any wording that's ambiguous about that, let us know. >> >> Section 3.b.iii says that Third-party viewers must comply with the GPL >> license. >> >> What if the view is not licensed under the GPL at all -- say Apache 2.0? > > This only applies to viewers based on our GPL'd viewer source. I'll > point that out to legal - I know the intent was to make that specific, > and this was an oversight.
I just checked before writing to legal, and this phrase is already included in 3.b.iii: "if you have based your application on the official Second Life viewer, which we have made available under the GPL" So this guy's already covered. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
