On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Ryan McDougall <sempu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Soft Linden <s...@lindenlab.com> wrote: >> >> If you see any wording that's ambiguous about that, let us know. > > Section 3.b.iii says that Third-party viewers must comply with the GPL > license. > > What if the view is not licensed under the GPL at all -- say Apache 2.0?
This only applies to viewers based on our GPL'd viewer source. I'll point that out to legal - I know the intent was to make that specific, and this was an oversight. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
