On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Soft Linden <s...@lindenlab.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Soft Linden <s...@lindenlab.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Ryan McDougall <sempu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Soft Linden <s...@lindenlab.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> If you see any wording that's ambiguous about that, let us know. >>> >>> Section 3.b.iii says that Third-party viewers must comply with the GPL >>> license. >>> >>> What if the view is not licensed under the GPL at all -- say Apache 2.0? >> >> This only applies to viewers based on our GPL'd viewer source. I'll >> point that out to legal - I know the intent was to make that specific, >> and this was an oversight. > > I just checked before writing to legal, and this phrase is already > included in 3.b.iii: > "if you have based your application on the official Second Life > viewer, which we have made available under the GPL" > > So this guy's already covered. >
Not sure how I missed that -- or maybe I am (too much legalese text). Can you also clarify what the penalties are for non-compliance? Cheers, _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
