> Nobody has yet posted a license to this list that would make it > possible to consider a scenario where it OpenOCD would only > allow honorable linking with closed source that could not be > exploited in some insidious way by a commercially orientated > villain Lots of people have, even you, it's called GPL v2. Please read my earlier post where I point out FTD2xx is not different from NVIDIA binary Linux kernel modules. I'm happy to let this go when someone comes up with a workable alternative, but unfortunately there isn't one atm.
If needed, make an addendum to GPL v2, describing this specific case in the most detail possible so it can't be abused for anything else. You can even add "only what <some name> says is accepted" if you're paranoid. gr. Ronald _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
