-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Openocd-development] Dynamic library loading From: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> To: Ronald Vanschoren <yahoogro...@lieron.be> Cc: openocd-development <openocd-development@lists.berlios.de> Date: Sun Jun 28 2009 20:39:05 GMT+0200 (Romance Standard Time) > (Lots of stuff deleted from your mail. Nothing is intended > by that other than that I couldn't really think of a reply.) > >> Can you please stop talking in riddles and just write what you want to say? >> > Am I always talking in riddles or just this once? > Just meant that it wasn't really clear what you meant. e.g.: "then it would be a good idea to check with the list." ... and what?
Just wanted to point out I didn't really understand your message, maybe I should have been more clear too ;-) >> I totally can't follow anymore, but are you one of the GPL purists? >> > > I don't know what a GPL purist is, so I couldn't possibly tell. > > I'm interested in a watertight scheme, legally and practically, > to ensure open source target support. > > I do *lots* of closed source development. It's what puts bread on the > table really, so I don't do GPL exclusively. > GPL purists (in this case) are the people that are against linking with FTD2xx. >> And please, what are you so afraid off? What commercial reason is driving >> you? >> > > Iron clad guarantees that we don't create loopholes for closed source > target support As said before, I am also against closed source target support, but I don't consider FTD2xx a closed source target. It's not different from using a serial or parallel port. You don't expect to have access to the serial/parallel port driver do you? The "intelligence" is in how you use the low level drivers, not in those generic parts. gr. Ronald ps: Not using HTML this time ;-) _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
