On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:03 PM, David Brownell<davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Sunday 28 June 2009, Ronald Vanschoren wrote: >> As said before, I am also against closed source target support, >> but I don't consider FTD2xx a closed source target. > > Good! We've been wanting to have source to that library. > > What's the ftdichip.com URL for downloading *SOURCE* code > to that driver library? I didn't see one when I browsed > their website last week...
FTD2xx is used as an interface not a target, so I don't care about whether or not it's closed source. Then on the other hand, why should I expect anyone to care about open source target support for me, if I don't care about their need for an open source interface? Seems like GPL ensures that my interests are looked after even if I'm to egoistic and shortsighted to do it myself ;-) -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://www.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
