Hi, I am testing the functionality in build #68
These I believe are issues, please check and comment. Test scenario, one moderator, two other participants (one with Audio & Video and one with Audio only) then join the meeting. A forth participant joins the meeting 1) When the moderator hovers over the red disable icon of the "Allow/Deny right to give exclusive audio" column for either of the two other participants, the text that hovers is "Allow user to give exclusive audio", but after they have been granted rights to give exclusive audio, if you hover over the green circled tick, then the text says "User is Moderator, he can do anything.", where as it would be more correct if the hover text said "Remove ability to give exclusive audio", like the "Remove ability to draw on the whiteboard". The "Allow/Deny right to Remote Control Screen" ticks also has the same issue (they display "User is Moderator, he can do anything."). In fact in this scenario the statement "User is Moderator, he can do anything." is incorrect as this user is not a moderator. 2) I would have expected that giving users the "Allow user to give exclusive audio" would allow users to control the who currently has exclusive audio (i.e. whose mic is not muted), but the users cannot control the use of "exclusive audio" (unless they are made moderators). 3) It seems the only way to give exclusive audio is by clicking the centre of that persons video window, but if a person is set to "Audio only", then they don't have a video window so there is no way to grant them "exclusive audio". Would it not be better to have a way to control exclusive audio from the "Users" list? Why not use the round green (user speaks) icon. (see point 5 where it was found that the fourth user to the meeting did get a third, video like window where they could control the "exclusive audio" for the person who was set to "audio only". But these windows did not appear for the moderator or the other two who were the first to join. 4) In the "Users" list there is a round green icon like the green icon that appears in the Video window, but unlike the video window, it does not change to solid green when the user is speaking, I believe it is supposed to? If it is not, then what does it do? The hover text says "User speaks". 5) when a fourth user joined the meeting (with no audio/video), they had two video windows (moderator and the one user who was sending video) and one other window like a video window but without any picture as the name label of that window indicated that it was the other user who was sending audio only. This fourth user, when made a moderator could control who had "exclusive audio", but only when a moderator. The other three users still had no way to give the "audio only" user, "exclusive audio". 6) I did a few audio tests to see how much echo was an issue, and I am amazed, I had no echo. I will try to test this again, another day. Thanks to those who have been working on OpenMeetings. Thanks, George Kirkham IT Manager Cooperative Research Centre For Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) NFF House, 14 - 16 Brisbane Avenue, Barton, ACT, 2600, Australia T: (02) 6120 1600 F: (02) 6273 7181 E: gkirk...@co2crc.com.au, W: www.co2crc.com.au From: brian mullan [mailto:bmullan.m...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 10 May 2012 8:53 AM To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: <red5httpport>80</red5httpport> Sergey I think you meant to say if you run service on port =< 1024 you need root privilages On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Sergey Kobzar <sergey.kob...@itcraft.org> wrote: On Linux to run service on port >1024 you need root privileges. Non-root users can run services on ports >1024. http://www.staldal.nu/tech/2007/10/31/why-can-only-root-listen-to-ports- below-1024/ for example... On 05/09/12 02:25, George Kirkham wrote: Mahmut, Thanks for your comments, the configuration that I am using is below, are these settings the same or similar to how you run OpenMeetings or port 80 ? If you don't mind sharing, what is your server's OS?, and what would be your configuration settings that gets OpenMeetings to run on port 80 instead of port 5080 ? Maybe there are other areas that I need to modify other that the two that I am currently changing. /etc/init.d/red5 start-stop-daemon --start -c nobody --pidfile $PIDFILE --chdir $RED5_HOME --background --make-pidfile --exec $DAEMON >/dev/null 2>/dev/null & /usr/lib/red5/conf/red5.properties # HTTP http.host=0.0.0.0 http.port=80 https.port=8443 http.URIEncoding=UTF-8 /usr/lib/red5/webapps/openmeetings/config.xml <red5httpport>80</red5httpport> I run OpenMeetings using http://mydomain.com.au/ and it will redirect to http://mydomain.com.au/openmeetings but then there is no response from the server. I am getting no error information from the log files. When I do netstat -anp | grep java tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:8100 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 4044/soffice.bin unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 22175 4044/soffice.bin /tmp/OSL_PIPE_0_SingleOfficeIPC_44e0c34da8623980ccf9f8299a62e4fb tcp6 0 0 :::1935 :::* LISTEN 4051/java tcp6 0 0 :::9999 :::* LISTEN 4051/java However when I run as root user, then all works, see below for "netstat -anp | grep java" /etc/init.d/red5 start-stop-daemon --start -c root --pidfile $PIDFILE --chdir $RED5_HOME --background --make-pidfile --exec $DAEMON >/dev/null 2>/dev/null & tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:8100 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 3880/soffice.bin unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 21314 3880/soffice.bin /tmp/OSL_PIPE_0_SingleOfficeIPC_44e0c34da8623980ccf9f8299a62e4fb tcp6 0 0 :::1935 :::* LISTEN 3887/java tcp6 0 0 :::9999 :::* LISTEN 3887/java tcp6 0 0 :::8080 :::* LISTEN 3887/java tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::* LISTEN 3887/java tcp6 0 0 192.168.1.123:57440 192.168.1.123:3306 ESTABLISHED 3887/java tcp6 0 0 192.168.1.123:57443 192.168.1.123:3306 ESTABLISHED 3887/java unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 21818 3887/java If I Thanks, George Kirkham IT Manager Cooperative Research Centre For Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) NFF House, 14 - 16 Brisbane Avenue, Barton, ACT, 2600, Australia T: (02) 6120 1600 F: (02) 6273 7181 E: gkirk...@co2crc.com.au <mailto:gkirk...@co2crc.com.au>, W: www.co2crc.com.au <http://www.co2crc.com.au> *From:*Mahmut TEKER [mailto:teker.mah...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, 9 May 2012 8:49 AM *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org *Subject:* Re: <red5httpport>80</red5httpport> Hi George, I am using OM on port 80 and there is no problem. In fact I could not understand your problem clearly. Can you post error messages or warnings in the logs. That would make the issue clearer, I think. Moreover, there is an issue that, as I remember right, running red5/openmeetings on a port below or equal 1200 requires to be root. Regards, _Mahmut TEKER On 5/9/2012 12:23 AM, George Kirkham wrote: Stephen, The server is only for OpenMeetings, so no Apache running (or installed), and nothing else on that port. I did find the difference, in my first server I was running openMeetings as the root user, but with subsequent servers I had been using nobody. Running OpenMeetings under nobody works well for port 5080, but not for port 80, and I cannot understand why that might be. One thing I could try is to create a full account called "openmeetings" which has a home directory and then try running OpenMeetings under this account. Sometimes software requires an account with a home directory, not just a dummy account. I believe the issue is related with OpenMeetings code somewhere, as the Red5 server is running and accepting connections (root), just when you try to run OpenMeetings itself, that fails. If I get success at any time, I will post back, but first I wanted to learn if anyone was familiar with the issue, and it looks like everyone else has their OpenMeetings servers either using port 5080 or are successfully running under 'nobody'. Thanks, George Kirkham IT Manager Cooperative Research Centre For Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) NFF House, 14 - 16 Brisbane Avenue, Barton, ACT, 2600, Australia T: (02) 6120 1600 F: (02) 6273 7181 E: gkirk...@co2crc.com.au <mailto:gkirk...@co2crc.com.au>, W: www.co2crc.com.au <http://www.co2crc.com.au> *From:*Stephen Cottham [mailto:stephen.cott...@robertbird.com.au] *Sent:* Tuesday, 8 May 2012 10:34 PM *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org <mailto:openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org> *Subject:* RE: <red5httpport>80</red5httpport> You aren't using Apache on the new Debian server are you? If Apache is running on port 80 then they will conflict. To aid in finding the problem, If you go here /usr/lib/red5 Then chmod 755 red5-debug.sh Then start it using the debug mode ./red5-debug.sh This will tell you more about why its failing to start. Cheers *Stephen Cottham** *Group IT Manager (Associate) Robert Bird Group Level 5, 333 Ann St Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia *Phone: +6173 319 2777 <tel:%2B6173%20319%202777> (AUS)* *Phone: +44207 592 8000 <tel:%2B44207%20592%208000> (UK)* *Fax: +6173 319 2799 <tel:%2B6173%20319%202799> * *Mobile: +61400 756 963 <tel:%2B61400%20756%20963> (AUS)* *Mobile: +447900 918 616 <tel:%2B447900%20918%20616> (UK)* *Web: **www.robertbird.com* <http://www.robertbird.com/> <http://www.robertbird.com.au/> This email and any attachments are confidential and may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. Unless expressly stated, confidentiality and/or legal privilege is not intended to be waived by the sending of this email. The contents of this email, including any attachments, are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us immediately by return email and then delete both messages. You may not otherwise read, forward, copy, use or disclose this email or any attachments. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states otherwise. It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses or defects before opening or sending them on. None of the sender or its related entities accepts any liability for any consequential damage resulting from this email containing computer viruses. Disclaimer added by *CodeTwo Exchange Rules* www.codetwo.com <http://www.codetwo.com> *From:*George Kirkham [mailto:gkirk...@co2crc.com.au] *Sent:* Tuesday, 8 May 2012 1:24 PM *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org <mailto:openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org> *Subject:* <red5httpport>80</red5httpport> Hi, Has anyone had success/issues with using port 80 instead of port 5080. I have a number of Debian OpenMeetings servers. The first that I built I have configured using port 80 instead of port 5080, and all works well. Since that time I have built a few more Debian OpenMeetings servers and I cannot get any of them to work with port 80. I really do not think the issue is with OpenMeetings or its configuration, because I can copy the entire "red5" folder from the new servers to the first (working) server and it will work on port 80. I am hoping that someone may have had similar issues and knows how to resolved it. Thanks, George Kirkham IT Manager Cooperative Research Centre For Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) NFF House, 14 - 16 Brisbane Avenue, Barton, ACT, 2600, Australia T: (02) 6120 1600 F: (02) 6273 7181 E: gkirk...@co2crc.com.au <mailto:gkirk...@co2crc.com.au>, W: www.co2crc.com.au <http://www.co2crc.com.au> *From:*George Kirkham [mailto:gkirk...@co2crc.com.au] *Sent:* Monday, 7 May 2012 9:19 PM *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org <mailto:openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org> *Subject:* RE: FW: Editing OpenMeetings language files Thanks, Sebastian for your comments. It is good to know. George Kirkham *From:*seba.wag...@gmail.com <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> [mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, 7 May 2012 5:23 PM *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org <mailto:openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org> *Subject:* Re: FW: Editing OpenMeetings language files Hi George, What is it that I should add to all the other language files? => It makes it more easy to give a complete (but not fully translated) file to translators. Lots of people tend to just download the language-xml file and translate that. If those files are all incomplete or certain labels are missing that this is just too confusing. The same English item, and then hope those with knowledge of the other languages modify for the languages that they are proficient in? => Yes you can fill them up in English and hope that some translators will look into that file. Of course it might take months or even years until really all languages are filled up. You could also use translate.google.com <http://translate.google.com> and look for a translation. Maybe there are other practices that I would be good for me to follow, if so, please let me know. => If you edit the XML files please don't add linebreaks (some editors do that automatically), if you want to include a "save" linebreak you would actually enter something like this: <br/> (this is XML encoded HTML linebreak "<br/>") Sebastian 2012/5/6 George Kirkham <gkirk...@co2crc.com.au <mailto:gkirk...@co2crc.com.au>> Hi, What is the correct process for adding a new item to the Language files ? I have been informed that "If you add a new label we have a common (undocumentated) rule: We add this label to all language files. You can fill up other language files the english one. However all language files should contain the same number of labels and not only a subset." What is it that I should add to all the other language files? The same English item, and then hope those with knowledge of the other languages modify for the languages that they are proficient in? Is there a way to ask others to check and update any languages that they are proficient in? Maybe there are other practices that I would be good for me to follow, if so, please let me know. I noticed that the Japanese file has <string id="262" name="salutation_miss"> <value>Ms.</value> </string> Thanks, George Kirkham -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock <https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock> <https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock> http://www.openmeetings.de http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com seba.wag...@gmail.com <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>