On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:56:32 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao <tsa...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> This replaces obsolete XIM and uses gtk api for IME.
>> Gtk uses [ibus](https://github.com/ibus/ibus)
>> 
>> Gtk3+ uses relative positioning (as Wayland does), so I've added a Relative 
>> positioning on `InputMethodRequest`.
>> 
>> [Screencast from 17-09-2023 
>> 21:59:04.webm](https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/assets/30704286/6c398e39-55a3-4420-86a2-beff07b549d3)
>
> Thiago Milczarek Sayao has updated the pull request with a new target base 
> due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 96 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'refs/heads/master' into new_ime
>  - Merge branch 'refs/heads/master' into new_ime
>  - Merge branch 'master' into new_ime
>  - Add signals to avoid warnings
>  - Merge branch 'master' into new_ime
>    
>    # Conflicts:
>    #  modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/native-glass/gtk/GlassApplication.cpp
>  - Add check for jview
>  - - Fix comment path
>  - - Fix double keyrelease
>  - - Use a work-around to relative positioning (until wayland is not 
> officially supported)
>    - Unref pango attr list
>  - Merge branch 'master' into new_ime
>  - ... and 86 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/compare/c8b96e4e...d6230dec

I tested it in the following two Linux environments, and the Chinese input 
looks fine.

Env1:

商业版本:LinxOS 6.0.99 EL20.03-SP3 20240531 \n \l
内核:Linux version 4.19.90-2206.2.0.0154.vlx15.v99_2003.x86_64 
(root@runner-sdczntp1-project-3842-concurrent-0) (gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)) #1 
SMP Wed May 29 10:22:41 CST 2024

Env2:
商业版本:[dist]
name = KylinSec-Server-PG
milestone = V3-240605-1330
arch = x86_64
dist_id = KylinSec-Server-PG-V3-240605-1330-x86_64
[os]
installtype = graphical-server-environment
内核:Linux version 4.19.90-2405.3.0.0276.kb1.ky3_4.x86_64 
(mockbuild@localhost.localdomain) (gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)) #1 SMP Thu May 23 
16:22:59 CST 2024

> @Glavo did you get any feedback?
> 
> I can provide a build with this PR included, if that's getting on the way.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1080#issuecomment-2272653202

Reply via email to